The Response of the Judiciary to Intimate Partner Violence in Addis Ababa City Administration

Abstract

In Ethiopia, cases of intimate partner violence against women
(IPVAW) are frequently adjudicated using the same procedures as
ordinary criminal cases, despite their distinct nature. This practice,
lacking a human rights-based approach, heightens the risk of
secondary victimization. This article assesses how the judiciary
responds to IPVAW cases, focusing on the adjudication process,
judicial decisions, case timelines, and available protective measures.
A qualitative research approach was employed drawing on data
from survivors, actors within and outside the legal system, and
relevant IPVAW court cases in selected courts in Addis Ababa. The
research identified significant challenges to an effective judicial
response such as absence of specialized procedures, protracted case
resolutions, lenient sentencing, and insufficient measures to ensure
the dignity, safety, and privacy of survivors. Based on these
findings, the article recommends reforms that prioritize survivors’
rights and safety throughout the court process. Key suggestions
include providing specialized training for judges and court
personnel and implementing targeted strategies to ensure that
survivors are protected from further harm.
Keywords: Courts, Ethiopia, Human Rights-Based Approach,
Intimate Partner Violence, Women
25