Effects of graphic organizers on students’ reading engagement of Ethiopian grade five students

Authors

Keywords:

graphic organizers, reading engagement, EFL students, primary school

Abstract

Reading engagement remains a major challenge among Grade Five EFL learners in Ethiopia, where limited exposure to English texts and teacher-centered instruction often reduce students’ motivation and active participation in reading. To address this gap, the present study examined the effect of graphic organizers on students’ behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement in reading. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design was employed, involving 98 students sampled from a single school. The study was conducted over a seven-week intervention period. The experimental group (49 students) received reading instruction using instructional materials prepared by the researchers, which incorporated various graphic organizers, such as concept maps, Venn diagrams, Know–Want to Know–Learned charts, story maps, and cause-and-effect charts, applied to reading passages sourced directly from the Grade Five English textbook. In contrast, the comparison groups (49 students) were taught through teacher-centered methods using the textbook’s standard activities without any graphicorganizer. Quantitative data were collected through a reading engagement questionnaire, and qualitative insights were gathered via focus group discussions to complement and deepen the interpretation of results. The post-test findings revealed that the experimental group (M = 111.67) demonstrated significantly higher engagement than the comparison group (M = 85.57), with a mean difference of 26.10, t (96) = 12.47, p < .001, and a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.97, η² = 0.69). Qualitative findings supported these results, showing that students found reading more interesting, interactive, and meaningful when graphic organizers were used. Overall, the study concludes that integrating graphic organizers into EFL reading instruction enhances students’ behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement, suggesting their strong potential for promoting active, student-centered learning and improving reading comprehension in primary classrooms.

References

Adane, M. (2024). A study of the practices of teaching reading comprehension skill: The case of Grades 5 and 6 of Karalo Kindergarten and Primary School in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa University]. AAU Institutional Repository. https://etd.aau.edu.et/items/774fc89a-dae0-4528-84a7-cb3897b1b20e

Ahmad, R., Khan, S., & Ali, F. (2021). Effects of visual scaffolding tools on student engagement in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 345– 359.https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1203.07

Albufalasa, M. (2022). Enhancing reading engagement through graphic organizers: Evidence from EFL classrooms. International Journal of English Language Education, 10(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v10i2.20345

Albufalasa, R. (2024). The impact of graphic organizers on reading comprehension and engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1234/jer.2024.012

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.

Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The effects of visual mapping on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(4), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/747223

Anderson, R. C. (2010). Schema theory and the role of prior knowledge in reading comprehension. Routledge.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Axrorova, D. (2025). Graphic organizers and motivation in secondary EFL learners: A classroom-based study. Journal of Second Language Teaching, 17(1), 55–72.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1932024X.2025.1987654

Bromley, K., DeVitis, J., &Modlo, M. (1999). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension. Reading Teacher, 52(5), 486–494. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.52.5.3

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press.

Burns, M., Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2023). The effects of graphic organizer complexity on reading engagement in middle school learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 55(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1086296X.2023.1894521

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Duke, N. K., Ward, A., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). Summarization and reading comprehension:Evidence-based practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.342

Flygen, A., & Hunter, R. (2000). Teaching with graphic organizers: Strategies for success. Scholastic Press.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Griffin, P., & Tulbert, B. (1995). Graphic organizers: A teaching strategy. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 48–51.

Griffin, P., & Tulbert, B. (2023). The use of graphic organizers in ESL classrooms: A systematic review. TESOL Quarterly, 57(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.351

Guo, L., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Using graphic organizers to enhance reading engagement in high school EFL students. TESOL Journal, 14(1), e5678. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.5678

Guo, L., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2023). Graphic organizers and critical thinking. development in EFL learners. Language Learning Journal, 51(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2123456

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and Motivation in Reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafidi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403– 423. https://doi.org/10.1037/00220663.96.3.403

Hall, T., & Strangman, N. (2002). Graphic organizers and education: Enhancing learning and comprehension. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.

Hernández Chérrez, E., Hidalgo Camacho, C. S., & Carrera Martínez, V. P. (2020). Graphic Organizers for the Enhancement of EFL Reading Comprehension. Chakiñán, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 12, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.12.07

Hunde, D., & Hika, M. (2023). Student-centered teaching practices in Ethiopian primary schools: Implementation and challenges. Ethiopian Journal of Education Studies, 14(2), 23–42.

Kansızoğlu, Ö. (2017). Effectiveness of graphic organizers in language learning: A meta-analysis. Journalof Literacy Research,49(4),467–492.https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17714567

Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020301

Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2020). Graphic organizers and their effects on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.285

Markley, R., & Jeffers, K. (2001). Scaffolding student learning with graphic organizers Education Development Center.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mendhakar, P., Sharma, S., & Verma, R. (2025). Cognitive linguistic foundations of graphic organizers in classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000721

Ministry of Education (MoE). (2005). Education and training policy. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Nesbit, J. C., &Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413

Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375.

Piaget, J. (1970). The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Press.

Qi, W., & Jiang, Y. (2021). Use of a Graphic Organizer as a Pedagogical Instrument for the Sustainable Development of EFL Learners’ English Reading comprehension. Sustainability, 13(24), 13748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413748

Rahat, A., Rahman, S., & Shahabullah, M. (2020). Graphic organizers as instructional tools in English language classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1318a

Robinson, L., & Kiewra, K. (2024). Graphic organizers: Effects on K–12 academic outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024- 09601-7

Rodríguez Hermenegildo, E. G., & García Villao, R. T. (2025). Use of graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension. Revista Veritas de Difusión Científica, 6(1), Article403. https://doi.org/10.61616/rvdc.v6i1.403

Santika, E. E., Anita, F., & Darajad, A. (2021). A systematic review of graphic organizers method in reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Education (JELTE), 2(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.31571/jelte.v2i2.65

Santos, P., & da Silva, R. (2020). Graphic organizers in EFL reading instruction: Effects on engagement among advanced learners. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n6p45

Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2013). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.59

USAID. (2018). Early grade reading assessment: Ethiopia country report. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Z., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2

Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51–85). Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, H., & Li, J. (2021). The impact of graphic organizers on EFL reading comprehension and engagement: Evidence from Chinese secondary schools. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.5296/rfl.v33i2.18765

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Mehari, Y. M. ., Bewuket, H. K. ., & Akalu, S. M. . (2026). Effects of graphic organizers on students’ reading engagement of Ethiopian grade five students . Ethiopian Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 11(1), 1–25. Retrieved from https://ejol.aau.edu.et/index.php/EJLCC/article/view/13120